How This Briefing Works
This dossier opens with key findings, then maps the gap between what Rockerbox discloses and what BLACKOUT observed at runtime. From there: what it means for your organization, what to do about it, and the detection evidence underneath. BLACKOUT observes runtime browser behavior and cites the regulations that address each pattern — legal determinations are your counsel's call.
At a Glance
across 1 sites
vendor fires before consent
Briefing
Rockerbox provides marketing attribution through persistent visitor tracking across domains and sessions. Detected BTI codes indicate consent bypass (C09), fingerprinting (C10), cross-domain synchronization (C08), and defeat device behavior (C01) that may compromise marketing measurement accuracy while feeding competitive intelligence networks.
What This Means For You
Marketing teams rely on attribution data for budget allocation. If Rockerbox tracking is blocked by 40%+ of visitors, your attribution model systematically undervalues top-of-funnel channels. Meanwhile, your prospect behavior trains competitors' models through shared attribution network.
Risk Channel Breakdown
Attribution models rely on fingerprinting and cross-domain tracking that may be blocked by privacy controls, creating incomplete conversion paths and distorted ROI calculations.
Multi-touch attribution requires sharing visitor behavior with attribution network. Your prospect interactions become training data for competitors using same platform.
Expands attack surface
Consent bypass patterns and aggressive fingerprinting create regulatory exposure under GDPR/CCPA. Cross-domain tracking without explicit consent violates most privacy frameworks.
Threat Indicators
Runtime-observed (BTI-C)
Evasion infrastructure, auditor bypass
Identity stitching
Ignoring CMP signals
Device identification
Per-code narrative explanations of what each detected behavior means for your organization
Per-code evidence with full attribution chain, severity rankings, and consequence narratives See pricing →
Claims vs. Reality
BLACKOUT analyzed Rockerbox's public claims against observed runtime behavior and identified 1 contradiction.
Full claim-vs-reality gap analysis with claim text, observed behavior, severity, regulatory citations (GDPR, CCPA, ePrivacy), and evidence pointers per gap See pricing →
What To Do
4 for current users · 3 for evaluators
contractual leverage points
Role-specific actions (security / legal / marketing / procurement), full negotiation brief with contractual language, and BTI-code-specific consequences See pricing →
Supply Chain & Pairings
Full supply-chain mapping (loads / loaded-by lists with vendor identities) and the undisclosed-subprocessor list with observation evidence See pricing →