How This Briefing Works
This report opens with key findings, then maps the gaps between what Admanager Google discloses and what BLACKOUT observed at runtime. From there: what it means for your organization, what to do about it, and the detection data and evidence underneath.
Key Findings
Pre-Consent Activity
Admanager Google was observed loading and executing before user consent was obtained on 50% of sites where it was detected.
Claims vs. Observed Behavior
pending
“Requires claims extraction via CDT”
Live website analysis pending
What This Means For You
What To Do About It
Role-specific actions based on observed behavior
If You Use Admanager Google
- →Require Google Ad Manager to execute post-consent only with strict cookie categorization
- →Implement server-side header bidding to reduce Google data access
- →Add Google data sharing disclosure to privacy policy including cross-property sync
- →Deploy independent attribution measurement (Kochava, AppsFlyer) to audit Google overcounting
If You're Evaluating Admanager Google
- →Review Google DPA for publisher data usage rights and competitive restrictions
- →Audit Google attribution accuracy vs. third-party measurement (expect 15-30% discrepancy)
- →Assess header bidding vs. Google Open Bidding revenue impact
- →Calculate Google tax: (Ad Manager fee + yield loss from Google Ads preferential access)
Negotiation Leverage
- →Cross-domain tracking without consent violates GDPR Article 6 - require technical controls preventing pre-consent execution
- →Essential cookie miscategorization violates ePrivacy Directive - demand reclassification to advertising cookies requiring explicit consent
- →Publisher data usage for Google Ads optimization creates competitive conflict - require DPA amendment restricting data sharing to core ad serving function
- →Google attribution overcounting distorts budget allocation - demand independent measurement reconciliation with true-up provisions
Runtime Detections
BLACKOUT observed this vendor's JavaScript executing in a live browser and classified each hostile behavior using our BTI-C (Behavioral Threat Intelligence — Capability) taxonomy. These are not theoretical risks — each code below was triggered by something we watched this vendor's code actually do.
Keystroke/mouse tracking
Impact: Captures ad engagement patterns for audience profiling and targeting optimization. Creates GDPR personal data processing without documented legal basis when executed pre-consent.
Identity stitching
Impact: Synchronizes visitor identities across Google properties (YouTube, Search, Gmail) via shared ID space. Extends GDPR compliance scope to entire Google ecosystem.
Ignoring CMP signals
Impact: Executes ad tracking before consent via essential cookie miscategorization. Documented in pre-consent timeline showing advertising cookies loading before consent collection.
IOC Manifest
Indicators of compromise across 3 categories. Use for detection rules, CSP policies, or Pi-hole blocklists.
No indicators in this category
Ecosystem & Supply Chain
Evidence Artifacts
Artifacts collected during analysis, available with evidence-tier access.
Complete network capture with all requests and responses
25 detection signatures across scripts, domains, cookies, and network endpoints